Henry Interview with L’Equipe and Alternate Reality Game

The interview Henry gave to French sports paper L’Equipe has finally surfaced in the English media. I’ve posted the interesting excerpts below. Highlights include Henry’s reasons for not retiring after WC 2006, how he has felt since THAT play-off incident and his thoughts on retiring from Les Bleus before South Africa.
“Oh yes,” the France captain was quoted in Monday’s French sports daily L’Equipe as saying when asked whether retiring from international soccer had crossed his mind.
“Friday, when it all went too far, I was very worked up.”
Henry has been under fire since handling the ball in the build-up to William Gallas’s equaliser that gave France a 1-1 draw on Wednesday and a 2-1 aggregate win.
“It’s not the first time (that I thought about retiring),” Henry added. “After the 2006 World Cup, I thought about it, but it was too early. After Euro 2008, too, but it wasn’t the right moment. There was a generation that needed me.
“Despite everything that has just happened and the fact that I felt let down, I will not let my country down,” he added.
Henry, who issued a statement saying a replay would be the fairest solution only after world government body FIFA said the result would stand, said he regretted the way he had celebrated the decisive goal.
“I shouldn’t have done that but, frankly, it was uncontrollable, after all we had been through,” he said. The 32-year-old Henry, who has scored a French record 51 goals from 117 internationals, blamed the French Football Federation for their lack of support.
“The day after the match, and the day after that, I felt alone, really alone,” he said. “It was only after I issued my statement that the people from the French Federation got in touch.”
But what If Henry had thrown in the towel, who would be the next best choice for captain?
Once I began thinking about it, I realized that the possibility is terrifying. But, before I get ahead of myself, let’s run through the necessary qualities that a captain must have.
- history of achievement and success
- experience playing in big games
- the desire and ability to lead by example
- team spirit
- the ability to handle conflicts that inevitably arise in high-pressure situations fairly and quickly
- the desire and ability to contribute to the team’s strategic planning
- professionalism in-spite of high emotions and conflicting personal feelings
- credibility to challenge the referee, the opposing team and even teammates
- the ability and desire to build relationships on the team– between the captain and his teammates as well as between other teammates
- the ability and desire to motivate and inspire the team to transcend expectations and even their own ability
- the ability to hand the pressure and expectations of being the team captain
Anything else you think is important?
Now, I’ll be the first one to admit that Henry doesn’t score a perfect 10 in each of these categories, after all no one is perfect– but he has demonstrated his ability to have these qualities in most situations.
So what would happen if Henry was no longer on the French team? I shudder to think of the thought, but he is getting old(er) and is increasingly injury prone. So, this is pretty much inevitable even he isn’t planning to do until after next summer. Who could fill his shoes?
The most likely (older, successful, most experienced) contenders include a failed Arsenal captain with a history of fighting with the younger generation, a failed Lyon captain with a history of drinking and driving and a moody nomad.
The obvious choice is Sidney Govou– and I say obvious because he has taken over the France captaincy when Henry was subbed out before (Austria, October 2009). And by all accounts, he is a nice guy that tends to get along with everyone. When Puel made him his captain earlier this year, he described him as someone who “gets on well with everybody, always finds the right words,” and someone that “everybody likes because he is very thoughtful, very good at stepping back to analyse things.” He also has a lot of institutional experience with the French team. He has been apart of the national team for 7 years and has been at Lyon for forever. And, though coaches and players have come and gone– he has managed to remain a part of each coach’s plans. That demonstrates his ability to adapt to different coaches and systems. As Lyon’s captain he was able to lead his team through some inspirational performances, particularly their win at Anfield against Liverpool.
Unfortunately, some of these qualities have been called into question lately when his Lyon captaincy was stripped away earlier this year after a SECOND drunk driving episode in Lyon the night before a game. I can’t say that screams leadership potential, but I’ve never heard of him behaving like this during his seven years with the national team.
Despite these recent errors in judgement, you have to admire the guy for his commitment to Lyon. Some people might argue that it would be harder for a player whose only ever found success in Ligue 1 to have credibility on the big stage with referees, opposing teams or to manage the various egos of the French team. Given that I blog for The Offside’s OM and Ligue 1, I obviously disagree with this opinion. And, even if this was true in most cases, if anyone is an exception to this, it would probably be Sidney. Over the years, he has definitely received offers to play at “bigger” clubs, but he has chosen to stay with Lyon. I think his loyalty is something to be applaud, not punish.
The next obvious choice is probably Anelka, who I believe has also taken the captain’s arm band when Henry has been taken off (please, correct me if I’m wrong). Early in his career, Anelka was a bit of his generation’s Hatem Ben Arfa (who I love, love, LOVE but I am finally to the point where I can recognize Hatem is somewhat flawed). He had cultivated somewhat of a negative reputation as moody, impatient and talented but lazy. He lived a sort of nomadic lifestyle traveling from club to club (ranging from Arsenal to Real Madrid to Bolton) trying to find success. Then, he was signed by Chelsea in January 2008. Things didn’t come together immediately for him though, he only scored once that whole Spring (in the FA Cup competition against Wigan) and he received some bad press for missing his penalty kick in the Champions League final which gave United the title.
Despite his history, Chelsea, the press and fans were pretty understanding and Avram Grant took most of the flack for his poor performance record (Grant primarily used him as a sub). But, things started to change for Anelka once the new season began– starting with him scoring 4 goals against AC Milan in a pre-season friendly. At the start of the 08-09 campaign, he received his chance to prove himself when Drogba was injured and ended up score 25 goals for Chelsea (including 19 in the EPL). This year he has scored only 3 goals in 13 games for Chelsea, but he has scored 2 crucial goals for France since the start of World Cup qualification (against Ireland at Dublin and the winning goal against Serbia a the start of the qualification campaign). Basically, he has been able to step for France when we have needed him.
But, Anelka’s talent and ability aren’t really news- everyone has also marveled at his skill. Throughout his career, his achilles heel has been his attitude…until now. The best thing that has emerged since his transfer from Bolton to Chelsea has been his maturity and newfound modesty. I’m thrilled that Anelka’s career is finally taking off and he has finally found some mental peace (and it gives me hope for Ben Arfa). That said, this is a fairly recent evolution for him as a player so I’m not sure I feel comfortable saying that he could sustain this attitude under a lot of pressure over an extended period of time. For me, he is untested as a leader…and this French team is not the appropriate testing ground.
I also mentioned Gallas as a possible contender previously. Let me preface what I’m about to say with the following: Gallas is an undervalued, amazing player and a great informal leader on any team he plays on. I love watching him play for his technique and his tough, macho style (I love watching him put Nani in his place over and over again).
That said, I don’t think he handles the pressure of being a captain very well given his experience at Arsenal. Though his relationships with the younger players seems fine now, in the past he has been more of an agitator of the generation gap than peacemaker based on his own admissions in his biography. So, I don’t see a formal leadership role for him on this team in the near future.

The last contender, Alou Diarra, only has somewhat of an outside shot. This year he has been an amazing captain for Bordeaux, leading them to second place in Ligue 1 and qualifying as first in their European Group (which included beating Bayern twice and Juventus!). I will admit that I don’t know much about Diarra career before Bordeaux other than the fact that he was somewhat of a late bloomer, having unsuccessful stints at Bayern, Liverpool and Lyon before finding success under Blanc at Bordeaux (though I think he had 1-2 successful seasons at Lens at some point). He has played for the French National team since 2004, but he has only accumulated 24 caps (and 13 of them are substitute appearances), so he is hardly a staple of the first team. Alou’s leadership skills which he displays well at Bordeaux have also failed to translate over to the national team. His persona at Bordeaux is vastly different from his personality when he plays for France. One French sports correspondent described the difference:
I am not convinced by Alou Diarra team in France while I am convinced by Alou Diarra Girondins de Bordeaux. One has the impression that he is shy, he is always holding back. With Girondins, he is aggressive in all his actions. One has the impression that he is reining himself in, even when he is performing well. With Bordeaux, against Juventus, he was enormous despite the complicated (high pressure) context. Then, he was enormous in the second leg in Munich. There is a difference that I cannot explain between Bordeaux’s Alou Diarra and that of the national team. The seasons have passed and he still cannot reproduce [it] here.
Until Alou steps up on the French team and gets himself in a position to regularly hold on to his position with the National Squad, he probably won’t be a serious contender. Which is a pity really because I think he is a fantastic captain for Bordeaux.
There are a few other less controversial contenders– Toulalan and Patrice Evra– who are excellent players and seem like great guys, but they don’t scream LEADERSHIP to me.
Patrice is known as a joker– he seems more comfortable clowning around with his teammates than pushing them to be better.
Toulalan has been throwing me through a loop recently– I’ve always thought of him as a constant calm, even keeled player. But, he has been demonstrating some erratic behavior as of late. A few weeks ago he apparently had to be restrained from attacking his Lyon coach, Puel. Apparently he was insulted by being ordered to “keep it simple” in the midfield and instead of keeping a cool head, angrily retorting that “Just because you [Puel] never knew how to dribble doesn’t mean we shouldn’t do it.” I can only imagine what he thinks of Domenech.
Did I miss anyone? Does anyone want to make a case for Ribery or one of the younger squad members?
-
http://france.theoffside.com/ Thomas
-
Frédéric
-
sandrahn
-
sandrahn
-
http://france.theoffside.com/ Thomas
-
Jeff
-
Jeff
-
Jeff
-
Jean-François
-
sandrahn
-
Jean-François
-
http://france.theoffside.com/ Thomas
-
Jean-Francois
-
gaston
-
Jason
-
Michel-Olivier
-
Sarah

World










