Playing for France, or Playing for Africa?

May 28th, 2007 | By: Laurie | 17 Comments »

I stumbled on an interesting Senegalese article this weekend about upcapped call-up Bakary Sagna. (Original article in French is here. Amazingly comprehensible Google-translated article is here.) The title of the article is, in part, “Domenech Ruins the Plans of Kasperczak.” (Henri Kasperczak being the coach of the Senegal National Team.) It says, in part:

Raymond Domenech cut the grass under the feet of [or, if you prefer an English idiom, pulled the rug out from under] Henri Kasperczak, who was counting on this young soccer prodigy to reinforce the right side of his defense.

Sagna was born in France, but he is of Senegalese origin. This means that he is eligible to play for either country. One of the points of the article is that not only has the Senegal coach lost Sagna, but he may have also lost other players who see Sagna’s call-up as a reason to continue hoping for their own France call-ups.

Additionally, once a player plays for France, he becomes ineligible to play for another country, even if he’s never called up for France again. So players who could provide huge benefits for a smaller country aren’t playing at all because they played at one time for a larger country. (Can somebody fill me in on the details of international call-ups? I know that playing for a senior team means that you’re ineligible to play for another team, but what if you’re called up yet remain uncapped? If Sagna sits on the bench but doesn’t see playing time, will he still be eligible to play for Senegal?)

On the list of the France team, published day before yesterday by Raymond Domenech for the group matches of Euro 2008, a good half-dozen players could have carried the colors of African countries. It is the case of Bakary Sagna for Senegal (Auxerre), of Abou Diaby and Djibril Cissé for the Ivory Coast, of Alou Diarra and Lassana Diarra for Mali, of Samir Nasri and Karim Benzema for Algeria.

Of all of the arguments I’ve seen against the multi-national and multi-racial French squads, this is the only one that holds any water for me. As much as I love seeing the best and brightest of multiple races and national origins playing on the team, I do wonder about what it’s costing other, smaller countries, particularly those in Africa. (Think Didier Drogba and Ivory Coast.)

I’m curious what others’ thoughts are on this. Should smaller countries like Senegal push for a rule change? Should the rules be changed, and if so, to what? And are coaches like Domenech calling up players like Sagna simply to stake their claim, just in case, even if they’re not planning to make the players a regular part of their teams? And is this right?



Related Posts


Subscribe
 

rss icon France World Cup RSS Feed

Print
Print this article
Share
del.icio.us:Playing for France, or Playing for Africa? digg:Playing for France, or Playing for Africa? newsvine:Playing for France, or Playing for Africa? reddit:Playing for France, or Playing for Africa? fark:Playing for France, or Playing for Africa? Y!:Playing for France, or Playing for Africa? stumbleupon:Playing for France, or Playing for Africa?

Comments
Username By supersebgrimaldi | May 28th, 2007 at 4:21 am
top comment
cornercorner

Hi Laurie,

I actually posted a comment on this on the intial call-up thread (5/24), and then I had thought that one of the reasons Sagna got called up is that le Raymond wants to “lock” him up so that Senegal can’t have him.

However, as it turns out, he actually would not have been able to play for Senegal anyway, according to this (yes, I did a bit of interesting research on this, so I’m not 100% certain).

There is some precedent, though, in the case of Jlloyd Samuel (England/T&T).

After January 2004, it appears FIFA instituted a restriction on players with dual citizenship/nationality who have appeared for a country at U23/21/19/etc. level and have not received any “A” caps yet. According to this rule, the player in question must “apply” by the day of his 21st birthday to keep the second nationality “open” or else he can only play for the country which he represented at U-x level.

Such had been the case with Jlloyd Samuel, who was born in Trinidad, represented England at U-21 and actually got called into the senior team as well, though he did NOT receive a cap at that level.

When the World Cup came around, Trinidad wanted to him to play for them and vice versa, since he’s not exactly a threat to Ashley Cole. FIFA then shot it down, though, citing what I’ve mentioned.

So with Sagna, who HAS appeared in the U-21s and HAS turned 21, it appears, according to this, he could only play for Les Bleus, which leads me to think he was named into the squad more on his being named (I think) as the top full-back in Ligue 1 than Domenech trying to hoard jewels out of Africa. (Regardless, I would have wanted Mexes in the squad, as he was named ROMA PLAYER OF THE SEASON.)

The rule on getting senior team caps is actually a lot simpler. If a player does get a cap at the “A” or senior level (it doesn’t matter whether it’s in a friendly, a testimonial game, anything), he’s locked. End of story.

Anyway, my personal opinion is that it works both ways (as there are those, like El-Mourabet and Chamakh) who chose their African roots instead of France. Liverpool’s Mohammed Sissoko did as well, and he was capped at the U-21 level I think for France.

I think I’m alright with it as long as the player didn’t “abandon” his country or a national team coach didn’t “rob” another country of its DEVELOPING the skills. For example, if Patrick Vieira, born in Dakar (Senegal), had played there in all his youth and joined the youth teams there, then I would feel guilty if he joined Les Bleus. (That wasn’t the case, as Vieira was “brought up” at Cannes, where he’d be with other stars, actually, Zizou and Micoud.)

Wow, this is a long post. Sorry about that. One more point, though. I’ll admit that I do have a sneaking suspicion that Domenech does know the FIFA regulations and has attempted to “rush” players into the senior squad in order to get them a cap. After all, he did call up Higuain, though he decided to join Argentina. (Higuain, I think, I’m quite ambivalent about as he was born in France, but raised in Argentina, doesn’t speak any French. Though he plays for Real.)

Whew. Anyway, terrific job on the blog, btw, I’m not 100% certain everything I typed is correct, though I did check all the sources.

cornercorner
Username By Laurie | May 28th, 2007 at 10:37 am
top comment
cornercorner

Thanks for researching this. I did a half-hearted google search and came up with a 2001 set of FIFA rules showing that players were inelegible for a country if they played on a youth team. I knew that had changed but never found specific details of the revisions like you’re showing. (I did find details of a 2004 rule change requiring players to have at least some connection to the counrty they’re playing for to get rid of football mercenaries. So Brazilians can no longer suddenly move to Qatar to join the National Team, which I found humorous.)

The article I read certainly seemed to believe that Sagna was eligible to play for Senegal. Now I’m curious. Do you have a link to your source?(Not that I don’t believe you completely — I just like to read things like this myself so I can apply them and write accurately about them in the future.)

And I agree with you about having no problem with Vieira-type or Thuram-type players on the team. They’re completely French, to my way of thinking. I guess my biggest concern is those players who get one call-up and are then dropped, when they could be doing good things for a smaller country.

I also thought the Higuain thing was funny. Clearly a case of Domenech trying to mark his territory, with the “territory” not wanting to be marked!

Posted from United States United States

cornercorner
Username By supersebgrimaldi | May 28th, 2007 at 4:43 pm
top comment
cornercorner

On the Jlloyd Samuel affair, try this: http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/football/world_cup_2006/4527526.stm

For the Pedro Emnauel and Angola story: http://www.cosafa.com/stories/STORY_438.html

Interestingly enough, though, I’ve also had a look at some articles that would appear to indicate Sagna could have worn a Senegal jersey. Perhaps Kasperczak thinks he can win on an appeal to FIFA?

Interestingly enough, if one looks at some of the even younger generation, there are some choices those players will have to make. To name a few,

Hatem Ben Arfa (87, Lyon, was courted by Tunisia for the WC, but has indicated he’d want to join his former U-16 buddies Nasri and Benzema for France)
Karim El-Mourabet (87, Nantes, born in France, but chose Morocco)
Distel Zola (89, Monaco, captain of the U-18s, born in Paris, appears to be inclined to join Les Bleus instead of Congo)
Frédéric Nimani (88, Monaco, same as Zola, French-born, wants France instead of Chad)

cornercorner
Username By Laurie | May 29th, 2007 at 12:30 pm
top comment
cornercorner

Everything I’m seeing says that you’re 100% correct. Changing countries requires a declaration before the 21st birthday if a player has played for a youth international squard.

I’m wondering why the article was so certain that he could play for Senegal. Question for anybody. All of the articles I saw — those above plus a couple of others — were dated before World Cup. There haven’t been any changes in the past year, have there? Or was the article just a case of wishful thinking on the part of Senegal?

Posted from United States United States

cornercorner
Username By Inara | May 29th, 2007 at 8:16 pm
top comment
cornercorner

I see why small countries like Senegal would want a rule change, but I think it would be really dangerous.

There are some who made representation a cold blooded decision. Think Mauro Camoranesi (Argentina but plays for Italy), Deco (Brazil but plays for Portugal), Kanoute (French but plays for Mali). These guys knew they didn’t have a good chance into making it into their proper NTs, so they chose to play for a country where they knew they would, either by heritage or by birth.

These types of players are the ones who often draw criticism because it’s no longer about representing their country but their own interests.

Then you have people who genuinely don’t feel an affinity with a smaller country. Take Karim Benzema, who could have played for Algeria. He turned it down saying that while Algeria is the land of his parents, he feels French. Same thing with Gonzalo Higuain. Despite being born in France, he feels Argentine. Freddy Adu is from Ghana but was raised in the US and wants to play for the American NT. Drogba could have played for France but felt a greater pull to represent the Ivory Coast.

Perhaps Sagna would have more opportunities to play for Senegal, and Senegal could certainly use his services. But if Sagna says he’s French, no one can say otherwise.

Posted from United States United States

cornercorner
Username By GFC | May 30th, 2007 at 12:39 am
top comment
cornercorner

This is an interesting discussion and debate. Let us not forget that in the past things were so messy. Players would play for say Argentina in the world cup one tournament and then play for Italy in the next…or even the great Puskas who was the leader of the formidable Hungarian team and then played for Spain in the 1962 world cup. At least now I feel players need to be accountable for their choices and the system is fairly clear. While some nations may suffer in some cases, other times they do not - Mali being a good case. They got Kanoute and Sissoko when both decided to play for Mali rather than France (where both were born), under the old system they would be “stuck” in the French rotation…although I would not mind seeing either one available for Les Bleus, especially Sissoko!

Posted from United States United States

cornercorner
Username By fab | May 30th, 2007 at 10:51 am
top comment
cornercorner

hahaha

im not even gonna say anything

except…AGAIN!!

how many french ppl are actually on the french team?

Posted from Canada Canada

cornercorner
Username By Inara | May 30th, 2007 at 1:02 pm
top comment
cornercorner

Saying Malouda is not French because he’s from French Guiana is like saying that someone born in an American territory can’t be called an American.

The entire “But he’s not really French” debate is stupid and stems from jealousy.

I wonder how the US would do in sports if they excluded players who are the children of immigrants or who are naturalized citizens here.

Posted from United States United States

cornercorner
Username By Laurie | May 30th, 2007 at 1:30 pm
top comment
cornercorner

GFC, Inara, and everybody, I hear what you’re saying. At the same time, I don’t know that a twenty-year-old has the life experience and maturity to make good choices. Say he has a 2% chance of ever playing for France, but 100% chance of playing for a less famous and less wealthy country. Did you have the maturity at twenty to weigh those odds? At twenty you’re invincible and OF COURSE you’ll be part of that 2%.

I’ll tell you what I’d implement if I were god of FIFA. (Are you listening, Michel Platini? Sepp Blatter? Of course you are.) I’d give every player the option of switching countries one time after the age of twenty-one, even if they’ve played on a country’s senior team.

But…hmm…on second thought, that opens the door to a Drogba or Kanoute having a chat with Raymond and then playing for France, too.

A very complicated issue! I’m enjoying the debate.

(Supersebgrimaldi, can you give me a shorter version of your name to call you by if I want to mention one of your comments?)

Posted from United States United States

cornercorner
Username By supersebgrimaldi | May 30th, 2007 at 2:52 pm
top comment
cornercorner

Seb will do fine. :-)

I’ll add that Vieira and Maké, the only 2 players I believe who were born outside France, are much more French than Deco is Portuguese/Camoranesi is Italian/Jonathan de Guzman (whose brother has been on the Canada NT) is Dutch.

I really don’t regret or fault the FFF for not having Drogba/Kanoute/Sissoko. Drogba was a late bloomer, as he didn’t become a star at all until he was 24-25. It’s almost the same with Freddie, who struggled to score early in his career. Also, the 77-78-79 generation has produced so many terrific strikers (Henry, Trez, Anelka, Saha, add Piquionne if you will).

As for Momo Sissoko, the defensive midfield position in the 84-87 generation is more than crowded. Lassana Diarra, Mavuba, Diaby, Flamini, Ducasse, etc.

cornercorner
Username By skillz | June 5th, 2007 at 8:10 pm
top comment
cornercorner

Im sorry but you cant compare America to France. They have different histories. Are we all going to act like France doesnnt have an ethnic population or are we going to say that France is like America or Canada or australia where there isnt any original ethnicity. Ive noticed that when people make the comparison they say ‘then all the black players shouldnt play’, excuse me, then neither should all the whities either. First Nations peoples are the true ethnicity of north america. its not white people, all they did is lie, deceipt, and enslave.

Posted from Canada Canada

cornercorner
Username By yanman | December 3rd, 2007 at 12:03 pm
top comment
cornercorner

Players such as Henry, Benzema, Nasri and mostly all others who hold dual citizenships were for the most part all born and raised in France (other than Makelele and Viera as mentioned earlier). Their first language is French, their friends are French and I’m sure they consider themselves as such. If we start saying that only people of true French descent can play for the national team then its gonna take years of painstaking DNA research to prove it. There has been so much migration by different peoples across history to all corners of the Earth that countries nowadays are made up of all races. Its win or lose in these situations because for every Ben Arfa you lose a Drogba (in the future this will be a close comparison hehe).

cornercorner
Username By Duncan | January 9th, 2008 at 11:57 am
top comment
cornercorner

Firstly, Platini isn’t head of FIFA, he’s the new big cheese over UEFA.

More importantly, I’m amazed that more of you aren’t considering the patriotic side to this. I’ll bet that each of these players have a preferred ideal for who they would wish to represent. Which country they feel they owe their allegiance to.

Most people on here seem to be just talking about players playing for the national team that they can, where they have some link to allow it.

For me, I was born and raised in England but have a Welsh grandfather and some players have managed to argue their way onto national teams via such tenuous links. However, if I were good enough to play for Wales and not England, I would feel like a right fraud pulling on a Wales jersey.

Posted from United States United States

cornercorner
Username By Laurie | January 9th, 2008 at 1:52 pm
top comment
cornercorner

What’s funny is that the FIFA/UEFA thing made it eight months without anybody commenting on it or me catching it. Funny thing is, my brain knows the difference, but my fingers sometimes go their own way. Fixed now.

Posted from United States United States

cornercorner
Username By sandrahn | January 9th, 2008 at 5:06 pm
top comment
cornercorner

Fab as usual demonstrates his ignorance and bigotry.

The overwhelming majority of France’s NT were either born and raised in France (making them French citizens, educated and trained there) or emigrated to France at very young ages (as toddlers or small children) — and were raised, educated and trained in France. Just because I was born in Brazil and emigrated to the US at the age of 4 doesn’t mean I am not an “authentic American”, whatever that means. It means that I am both Brazilian and American. The sheer stupidity of people like Fab beggars belief. Barack Obama, currently running for president, has an African father who emigrated to the US. Obama was born and raised in the US, as was Sagna. Is Obama not a “real” American?

For me the bottom line here is that it’s entirely up to the player. Freddy Kanoute was born in France but his family hails from Mali. He had the choice of playing for either country and chose to play for Mali. Sagna wants to play for France, the country where he was born, raised, and trained in football. Whatever their reasons, it’s their individual choice. I also lament at the affect on smaller, poorer nations but players shouldn’t be shackled to play for countries they weren’t even born and raised in if they choose not to.

Arsenal’s Eduardo da Silva was born in Brazil and emigrated to Croatia at the age of 15. He acclimatized himself to the culture, married a Croatian, became Dinamo Zagreb’s most important player (and team captain) and chose to take Croatian nationality. He is now Croatia’s best striker, a very critical member of the NT. He speaks the language fluently but has never forgotten Portuguese and keeps regular contact with relatives in Brazil. He is both Brazilian and Croatian.

Posted from United States United States

cornercorner
Username By killa | January 28th, 2008 at 12:20 pm
top comment
cornercorner

actually djibril cisse is from senegal not ivory cost

Posted from United States United States

cornercorner
Username By Sam Levenback » Football citizenship | February 6th, 2008 at 11:31 pm
top comment
cornercorner

[...] by France and the African nation of their parent’s birth. Some, like Arsenal fullback Bacary Sagna, choose to play for France. Sagna was born south of Paris to Senegalese parents. On the other hand, [...]

Posted from United States United States

cornercorner


Comments are closed


 
Go to WCB Homepage


Send Your Tips!

Found a great story, photo or video that's perfect for World Cup Blog?
Email tips[at]worldcupblog[dot]org

France Club Football News

FRANCE SOCCER JERSEY HOME FOOTBALL BLUE NEW 2008 ( ...
Price: $19.99
- 100% Prima cotton jersey T-shirt by Bulletin - C ...
Price: $25.00
Practice hard and get the adidas France Home Jerse ...
Price: $69.99

Powered by

More Europe Blogs

Monthly Archives

closer
World Cup Blog