Romania 0, France 0 – Les Bleus come out flat
France blogger Laurie said after the match that, “France usually plays pretty while being unable to score. This was 90 minutes of ugly.”
That’s quite a good synopsis.
I’ll add some of my post-game thoughts, most of which appeared a bit earlier on WickedDeflection.com.
I thought that Malouda, Anelka, and even Benzema had subpar performances; par being the international quality you’d expect to see from players in a top side in a major tournament. To continue the already-strained golf analogy, I’d put the other players on even par. Unfortunately, no one hit 10 under.
Neither Thierry Henry nor Patrick Vieira were fit to face Romania, so Nicolas Anelka and Jeremy Toulalan started. France generated very little going forward. Anelka headed one over. Benzema hit one or two right at the keeper. Gomis, when he came on, could hardly get a touch.
There was a short spell at the start of the second half when France looked ok, but for most of the game, they didn’t look like they deserved any more than a point against Romania.
Claude Makalele looked like France’s best player in the first half, but faded in the second half, as Toulalan saw more of the ball.
Malouda saw a lot of the ball in the first half, but did little with it.
Ribery was France’s best player in the second half, and probably the best player over the 90 minutes.
Coupet, Thuram, and Gallas had very little to do. The full backs Sagnol and Abidal were more involved, and did fairly well.
France Supporters would like to see more production out of left midfield, especially considering how much Malouda saw of the ball. That said, he had a good spell in the beginning of the second half when France looked most likely to score, but he’d still lead the list of players that France Supporters would like to see make way for other options, followed by Anelka.
Benzema’s subpar was just a matter of a missed put, really – he had some great touches and looked dangerous at times, but didn’t get involved as much as France Supporters would have liked, and when he did have a good chance, he hit it straight at the keeper, but he’s certainly not a player France Supporters want to see on the bench.
In addition to Gomis, France’s other substitution was Nasri, who wasn’t able to make a big impact when he came on.
As a spectacle, the game was poor. France’s performance overall was poor. Curious then, that I found the match so gripping, but that’s high-stakes international football.
No cause for panic and dismay, yet; France just need to get a little more push forward. It was almost a relief when the full-time whistle blew, because there wasn’t much between the sides down the stretch. With both teams winning corners, I had visions of France letting one in.
Those are just one person’s views. The alleged opinions of “France Supporters” are actually just my opinions, coupled with the assumption that another France Supporter somewhere in the world might agree with me – kind of a running gag, though not at all funny. Don’t be shy to tell me how very wrong you think I am if you think I’m very wrong. Comments are open.
-
Pride of Lyon
-
Foreverzidane
-
JustJack
-
http://thebeantownfrog.blogspot.com/ BeanTownFrog
-
Benjamin
-
http://ghana.worldcupblog.org Inara
-
Thomas
-
parisian indio
-
Darshan Shah
-
jeff
-
http://lesbleusfrancefoot.wordpress.com/ jean pierre
-
sandrahn
-
Jean-Michel
-
skillz

World










